10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00650-6 -> 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00650-6, which seems to be the "canonical" formatting. I'm wondering if the lowercase s is tripping up manubot. The other possibility, which I think is more likely, and more unfortunate, is that the parens are causing an issue, as that's also what seems to be unique to some of the broken DOIs (not exhaustively checked this).
This is a draft at the moment.
Purpose
Directions for reviewers
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the pull request ready for review?
Manuscript checklist
Unless otherwise noted above, this PR will be considered ready for review when all four items have been checked.
10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00650-6 -> 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00650-6, which seems to be the "canonical" formatting. I'm wondering if the lowercase s is tripping up manubot. The other possibility, which I think is more likely, and more unfortunate, is that the parens are causing an issue, as that's also what seems to be unique to some of the broken DOIs (not exhaustively checked this).
This is a draft at the moment.
Purpose
Directions for reviewers
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the pull request ready for review?
Manuscript checklist
Unless otherwise noted above, this PR will be considered ready for review when all four items have been checked.