refactor: Make `graphql-upload` great again 🇺🇸

[bnussman]

Why ❓

• This package has gotten completely messed up for many people and we need to stop pretending that it isn't this package's fault
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/374
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/369
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/368
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/360
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/356
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/346
  • https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/issues/329
  • I can keep going, but I won't

Description ✍🏼

• Re-write from Javascript to Typesript
• Uses Vitest to run unit tests
• Uses tsup to build esm and cjs
• Exports the types and functions in a way where it is easy to import them
• Uses pnpm as the package manager

Notes and Disclaimers 🗒️ ⚠️

• The diff makes it look like I added a lot of junk, but it's just because I committed the lock file. This is recommended practice and I don't know why it wasn't done before.
• I removed eslint and prittier to de-bloat this repo but if @jaydenseric admits this PR is the right direction to move in, we can add these back

Next steps ✅

1. Get @jaydenseric to admit this is much better than what this repo currently does
2. If we accomplish step 1, we can make this PR more "production ready"

[jaydenseric]

Closing, as per https://github.com/jaydenseric/graphql-upload/pull/376#pullrequestreview-1542160750 .

[bnussman]

Thank you for that very interesting perspective. Also, thank you for your time and development of this package. I respect your work and I do not intend to infringe on anything. Please let me know if these is any action I need to take to do so.

Also, thank you for the critical code review. While I disagree with some things, I learned your viewpoint and reason for doing things the way you do them.