Adyen Integration - Githubissues

jazzband / django-payments

Universal payment handling for Django.

https://django-payments.readthedocs.io

Other

1.06k stars 282 forks source link

Adyen Integration #117

Open anmolakhilesh opened 8 years ago

anmolakhilesh commented 8 years ago

I always wanted Adyen Integration within django payments.

patrys commented 8 years ago

I agree, it would be nice to have Adyen on board.

Echko commented 6 years ago

Are there any advances in this issue? Are there plans to support Adyen for the near future?

MaybeThisIsRu commented 2 years ago

Also very interested. Is there any documentation on writing a custom/additional backend for django-payments?

WhyNotHugo commented 2 years ago

Sorry, there's no documentation so far, though it's definitely on my roadmap.

In the meantime, here are some guidelines:

You need to implement a subclass of BasicProvider.
Your provider should implement the __init__, get_action, process_data, get_form, capture, and refund (note that the latter is optional).
I'd suggest having a look at #232, which is the latest provider that was merged, to understand all the extra bits that are involved.

Please do let me know if you try and implement a provider and have issues, I can use questions and feedback on this issue as a base for actual documentation.

MaybeThisIsRu commented 2 years ago

Hi @WhyNotHugo - in the end, we (the company I am working with) decided not to go for django-payments, at least not yet. I sent USD5.00 JazzBand's way as a personal donation, hoping to see your comment above in the readme/docs somewhere for others as well as the idea in https://github.com/jazzband/django-payments/issues/272#issuecomment-950129994.

WhyNotHugo commented 2 years ago

Thanks, much appreciated.

Out of curiosity (if you're allowed to share), what did you end up picking? Why didn't django-payment work for you?

MaybeThisIsRu commented 2 years ago

Out of curiosity (if you're allowed to share), what did you end up picking? Why didn't django-payment work for you?

We decided to implement a minimal, custom (and of course, documented) solution. Mostly we were worried about the activity on the project, and the currently open tickets don't look so good at first glance.