Closed hugovk closed 10 months ago
Once merged to your default branch, Codecov will compare your coverage reports and display the results in this comment.
Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered :open_umbrella:
Ah right, happy to close this if someone would rather debug the combining.
Alternatively, I'd probably factor the Django version into the matrix, so each is ran separately. This would also make good use of the 20 available parallel runners, also make it easier to see if something only failed for a single Django version.
Alternatively, I'd probably factor the Django version into the matrix, so each is ran separately.
Yeah, probably a good idea, then just run tox -e ...
:)
Would you like to put together a PR? Feel free to push to this, re-use/copy commits, or start fresh :)
@akx perhaps this CI file might help with some inspiration? https://github.com/django-parler/django-parler/blob/master/.github/workflows/tests.yaml This doesn't use tox, but let GitHub actions itself do the parallelization instead.
Seems this would be worth merging as it is and then open a new issue for implementing the parallel CI/testing later. WDYT?
@Huge - Sounds good. I'll see if I can find some time this week to work on this.
This fixes the coverage upload to Codecov.
Before
After
https://app.codecov.io/gh/jazzband/django-polymorphic/pull/565/tree