Closed michaelwheeler closed 3 years ago
Merging #74 (081d90d) into master (f977603) will increase coverage by
1.39%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #74 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 43.64% 45.04% +1.39%
==========================================
Files 2 3 +1
Lines 236 242 +6
Branches 62 62
==========================================
+ Hits 103 109 +6
Misses 123 123
Partials 10 10
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
django_redshift_backend/base.py | 42.91% <100.00%> (+0.24%) |
:arrow_up: |
django_redshift_backend/__init__.py | 100.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f977603...081d90d. Read the comment docs.
Failing tests appear to simply be due to incompatible Django/Python combinations. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to get this merged!
Thanks, 2 failing checks are caused from django-dev dropping python-3.6 and 3.7 support https://github.com/django/django/blob/64a0d1ef6e7a6739148996e9584bbb61fe3dcc60/setup.cfg#L35
No actions are required. I'll take a look later.
Memo: Django provides supports_aggregate_filter_clause
feature from django-2.0.
PR: https://github.com/django/django/pull/8352
Subject: Redshift doesn't support FILTER WHERE syntax
Feature or Bugfix
Purpose
Detail
Relates