Closed xdanielsb closed 5 years ago
Merging #417 into master will increase coverage by
0.09%
. The diff coverage isn/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #417 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.48% 88.57% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 24 24
Lines 2371 2390 +19
==========================================
+ Hits 2098 2117 +19
Misses 273 273
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/tablib/core.py | 81.64% <0%> (+0.74%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 51a720b...34fe723. Read the comment docs.
Thanks for the patch!
If you commit the patch yourself, may I ask you to squash commits before (either manually or by choosing Squash and commit
button)?
It would be great if you could also reference the issue number in the commit message.
sorry @claudep I made a mistake I did the squash and commit, and push to the wrong branch 'master', I did the rebase in the branch master to try to solve this problem, is there any way to solve that without doing a pull request again? I dont know if you can do the rebase the new commit name that I did was : "Elucidate the use of filters (and, or), this closes issue #251."
The commit is done, so no need to do anything else. Just for the next time, try to squash or just use the "Squash" merge button :-)
thanks @claudep, sorry for that nuissance commit
To be on the safe side, shall we protect master from direct commits?
https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/configuring-protected-branches
We could do that, but I don't have access to repo settings.
@jezdez Please could you protect the master branch for this project?
@hugovk Done. I've only enabled the general protection against force-pushes etc. Do you want me to enable other protections?
Oh, and I also disabled the "merge commit" merge option for the repo, so that only rebase and squash commits are allowed:
@jezdez Thanks!
Looks good, thanks!
Hi,
Concerning the issue #251 that I closed some minutes ago, I update the docs to clarify the usage of filters to generate filters type (or, and).
Regards,