Closed nandorholozsnyak closed 2 years ago
would it not be more right to name it after the root file the classpath library was made?
would it not be more right to name it after the root file the classpath library was made?
So you say if it has three files for example, App.java, AnotherApp.java and forexmaple TestApp.java, then should it be called App-jbang? It can work yeah, but what about the AnotherApp.java or maybe it could be named after the folder that contains all the files.
For me the module's name make sense to use, but I can imagine that it could/should be configurable. One module/folder can have multiple JBang scripts (depends on the use cases of course), so with that in my how would you infer that name?
Closed by 0.18.0
Fixed how @linux-china ?
Ah it was done some weeks ago. Was looking for recent PRs and couldn't find jt :)
Still thinks this should be named per source file rather than per module but current behavior works for now.
After the jbang script is being syncronized it has the name
jbang
for the dependency collector thing, but if a multi module project is being used it could be a bit "annoying", is there any way to append the name of the module as a prefix for the dependency collector?Original:
Idea: