configure:9081: checking compiler and flags for sanity
configure:9095: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -fstack-protector-all -fno-common -I/usr/local/opt/icu4c/include -I/usr/local/opt/ruby/include -I/usr/local/opt/sqlite/include -I/usr/local/opt/gettext/include -I/usr/local/opt/qt/include -L/usr/local/opt/icu4c/lib -L/usr/local/opt/ruby/lib -L/usr/local/opt/sqlite/lib -L/usr/local/opt/gettext/lib -L/usr/local/opt/qt/lib -fstack-protector-all conftest.c >&5
conftest.c:134:12: error: call to undeclared library function 'exit' with type 'void (int) __attribute__((noreturn))'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
int main(){exit(0);}
^
conftest.c:134:12: note: include the header <stdlib.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'exit'
1 error generated.
configure:9095: $? = 1
configure: program exited with status 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h, irrelevant */
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| #include <stdio.h>
| int main(){exit(0);}
|
configure:9100: result: no
configure:9102: error: *** compiler cannot create working executables, check config.log ***
gcc --version gives:
Apple clang version 15.0.0 (clang-1500.0.40.1)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
Running autoreconf does not help, because this test is written directly in configure.ac. Changing the CFLAGS to add -Wno-error=all at the CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized" bit helps, but the right way to do it is probably fixing the invocation. Because well, the compiler does not seem to be in the wrong here.
Current git HEAD gives:
gcc --version
gives:Running
autoreconf
does not help, because this test is written directly inconfigure.ac
. Changing the CFLAGS to add-Wno-error=all
at theCFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized"
bit helps, but the right way to do it is probably fixing the invocation. Because well, the compiler does not seem to be in the wrong here.