Closed antoniocalio95 closed 9 months ago
Thanks for the bug report. I've just pushed a new commit to the git that should fix this, as well as fixing the documentation mismatch though that won't be updated on the website until I make that update. If you can test it and let me know if it works for you that would be great.
I just tested it with the new SECM.py and I can confirm that it works as intended now, thank you very much!
Great, glad that fixed it! Let me know if you find other issues.
Here's the traceback:
Basically sasm_list is only defined in the case of an unsubtracted series at line 1485:
I quickly fixed it by adding this to handle my case:
Although maybe you want to fix it properly to handle all possible cases. Also, the parameters' default values for this method aren't set as they are described in the documentation, but that's also an easy fix.