Closed robwolff3 closed 1 year ago
ProtocOl or ProtocAl ;)
hi, i think this is a safe change for all can you do a PR for it please.
thanks
Heyhey @jblance,
I think, it might be a good idea, having a list of supported features/commands for the PI17 devices. If I look from my perspective, i found out, that GS and PS work but am uncertain if control also works and got no real overview.
What do you think?
If you run mppsolar command with no command after -c
but still supplying
the protocol you get a list of implemented commands eg mpp-solar -p test -P PI17 -c
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, 1:26 am JakobTewes, @.***> wrote:
Heyhey @jblance https://github.com/jblance,
I think, it might be a good idea, having a list of supported features/commands for the PI17 devices. If I look from my perspective, i found out, that GS and PS work but am uncertain if control also works and got no real overview.
What do you think?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jblance/mpp-solar/issues/319#issuecomment-1594674872, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJVKNQNRD7VPQY6KSCG6S3XLRNIBANCNFSM6AAAAAAVVWEVDI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I'm using the PI17 protocol with my MPP LVX6048WP. It working quite well! but I noticed unknown_value_in_response for many of the values in the HECS command. I changed the HECS potion of the protocol to the following and its working now for me:
I didn't want to assume this was a needed modification beyond my inverter model so I'm posting it here. I am more then happy to submit this as a pull request instead if that's appropriate.