adding support for local to remote operations in shutil.py::copytree

[brno32]

pt. 2 of addressing https://github.com/jborean93/smbprotocol/issues/221

Tackling symlinks looks a little daunting, so I'd like to circle back after making sure my current approach is aligned with the project.

It crossed my mind to have both LocalDirEntry and SMBDirEntry inherit from the same abstract class, but I've opted to keep it simple

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #227 (224339e) into master (285ad28) will decrease coverage by 0.02%. The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #227      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.09%   99.07%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        5081     5085       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         5035     5038       +3     
- Misses         46       47       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	99.07% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
py3.10	99.03% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
py3.11	99.03% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
py3.7	99.02% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
py3.8	99.03% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
py3.9	99.07% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
x64	99.07% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:
x86	98.99% <80.00%> (-0.02%)	:arrow_down:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/smbclient/shutil.py	95.32% <80.00%> (-0.39%)	:arrow_down:

[brno32]

@jborean93 are you okay with this kind of approach?

[jborean93]

Hey sorry I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, I've got a few things on my plate right now.

[brno32]

Good suggestions! I can work on tackling symlinks next if this looks like a good starting point

[jborean93]

Sorry it took so long to review this.