Fixes #799 - add rsp server feature

[robstryker]

Pull Request Checklist

General

• Is this a blocking issue or new feature? If yes, QE needs to +1 this PR

Code

• Are method-/class-/variable-names meaningful?
• Are methods concise, not too long?
• Are catch blocks catching precise Exceptions only (no catch all)?

Testing

• Are there unit-tests?
• Are there integration tests (or at least a jira to tackle these)?
• Is the non-happy path working, too?
• Are other parts that use the same component still working fine?

Function

• Does it work?

[sbouchet]

first comment about general usage of the view. below is the some screenshots of my tests.

[sbouchet]

first comment about general usage of the view. below is the some screenshots of my tests.

those are ok.

[sbouchet]

here the list is cropped at the very end.

[sbouchet]

is the secure storage pop pu is mandatory ? the text box is too short, please use all the space.

[sbouchet]

those two have some background issues and labels are not centered with the text boxes.

[robstryker]

is the secure storage pop pu is mandatory ? the text box is too short, please use all the space.

I'll try to use all the space.

Whether this specific prompt is necessary is more a question about the underlying RPS. The UI is just responding to a request for prompt from the background RSP and must display it.

[robstryker]

those two have some background issues and labels are not centered with the text boxes.

Looks fine in light mode, but not dark mode. Wonder what's wrong here.

[robstryker]

Looks fine in light mode, but not dark mode. Wonder what's wrong here.

Seems the styling matches on class names somehow, and extending "Composite" is frowned upon. Converting my composite subclasses to just be a kind of wrapper instead seems to fix it.