Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
You have to access index.jsp, not main.lzx.
Because this browser feature need swfEmbed parameters.
They declares in the index.jsp file.
TODO: adding history
*resize will implement in explorerBox components
Original comment by onoke...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2008 at 5:05
I don't see the point of a browser component..what is the benefit?
Original comment by p...@dolila.com
on 14 May 2008 at 12:57
I have noticed the embed-compressed.js have to be set in the root path, where
is as
same as main.lzx.lzr=swf8.swf file, for the binary release version. But this
change
for index.jsp file and i worry about it if someone have trouble cause of it.
So i might to do announce it before i commit. I have attached the patch file.
Please
give me a comment. When you set the main.lzx in swfEmbed(), you can use it at
your
development. Instead it to the swf file, you can use it for the binary release
version.
Original comment by onoke...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2008 at 1:54
Attachments:
there is another issue at this point:
If you use an invitation you get an url with the SWF directly in the URL, not
the
index.jsp.
You should also test the plugin's, they use also swfobjects.js to embed the
SWF, we
have to use another one here I think.
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2008 at 2:31
You mean if use embed-compressed.js in the startup page, it is good to name it
different with index.jsp ?
Original comment by onoke...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2008 at 12:33
Add a function "browser close" in it.
And replaced swfobject.js by embed-compresed.js in the index.jsp.
If there are any trouble, please let me know.
Original comment by onoke...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2008 at 2:12
I will re-add this feature again
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 6 Sep 2009 at 4:56
This issue was updated by revision r3235.
Add browser
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2010 at 12:09
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2010 at 12:12
This issue was closed by revision r3236.
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2010 at 12:13
Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 8:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
onoke...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2008 at 4:44