Closed wl2776 closed 1 year ago
wl2776,
The meaning of this PR does not make sense to me, can you explain to me why this modification is useful ?
If items in a file don't have TODO
, DONE
, etc keywords, that is, have a form <date> title
:
* <2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
* TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
.. then they appear with None
in the view "Time line for the current buffer":
None <2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
This commit removes these None
s:
<2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
For inline strikethrough,
I think vim should natively handle strike-through formatting, taking care of this is out of scope for vim-orgmode.
So, what is your decision? Will you merge it?
For the timeline, the white space separator still remaining between the (now) empty string and the date annoys me.
<2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
I think the right way to do it would be to include the whitespace only if it is separating the date from something. Can you take care of it ?
I think the right way to do it would be to include the whitespace only if it is separating the date from something. Can you take care of it ?
Done!
Source:
* <2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
* TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
Timeline:
<2022-02-21 Mon> tl1
TODO <2022-02-22 Tue> tl3
1. Gracefully format
None
in the view "Time line for the current buffer"Issue: If items in a file don't have
TODO
,DONE
, etc keywords, that is, have a form<date> title
, liketl1
below:.. then they appear with
None
in the view "Time line for the current buffer":Solution: this commit removes these
None
s:2. Add
strike-through
markup,gVim now supports it