Open vmaffei opened 4 years ago
Please use the R version first. I will find the cause of the discrepancy.
Best, Jun
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:16 AM Vince Maffei notifications@github.com wrote:
Hello! Thank you for developing this easy to use normalization technique!
The size factors calculated between the provided C library and R script appear to be slightly different. Example code and results are below.
library(vegan) library(GMPR) # C library source('GMPR.R') # R script
data(throat.otu.tab) data(throat.meta)
Calculate GMPR size factor# Row - features, column - samples
otu.tab <- t(throat.otu.tab)gmpr.size.factor <- GMPR(otu.tab)gmpr.size.factor.1 <- GMPR::GMPR(t(otu.tab))
head(gmpr.size.factor) ESC_1.1_OPL ESC_1.3_OPL ESC_1.4_OPL ESC_1.5_OPL ESC_1.6_OPL ESC_1.10_OPL 0.4131797 1.2472462 1.3175530 1.3269073 1.0525362 1.2882773 head(gmpr.size.factor.1) ESC_1.1_OPL ESC_1.3_OPL ESC_1.4_OPL ESC_1.5_OPL ESC_1.6_OPL ESC_1.10_OPL 0.3837041 1.4402244 1.4374717 1.5486711 1.2279985 1.3421698
By chance is one of these a later version than the other? Which of these would you recommend for use?
Thank you for your time!
Vince
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jchen1981/GMPR/issues/5, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHOPVREESGUDGV4HMXKILTRX5YTBANCNFSM4OEY2YEQ .
Hello! Thank you for developing this easy to use normalization technique!
The size factors calculated between the provided C library and R script appear to be slightly different. Example code and results are below.
By chance is one of these a later version than the other? Which of these would you recommend for use?
Thank you for your time!
Vince