I believe labtime.setrate(n) should make the simuation faster than real time for n times. But the actual result is not expected.
from tclab import labtime, clock
import time
time_start = time.time()
labtime_start = labtime.time()
def do(n):
print("\nRate =", labtime.get_rate())
for t in clock(n):
t_real = time.time() - time_start
t_lab = labtime.time() - labtime_start
print("real time = {0:4.1f} lab time = {1:4.1f}".format(t_real, t_lab))
labtime.set_rate(2)
do(100)
Rate = 2
real time = 0.0 lab time = 0.0
real time = 0.4 lab time = 1.0
real time = 0.7 lab time = 2.0
real time = 1.0 lab time = 3.1
real time = 1.2 lab time = 4.0
real time = 1.4 lab time = 5.1
real time = 1.5 lab time = 6.1
real time = 1.6 lab time = 7.1
real time = 1.7 lab time = 8.2
real time = 1.8 lab time = 9.1
real time = 1.8 lab time = 10.3
real time = 1.9 lab time = 11.0
real time = 1.9 lab time = 12.4
real time = 1.9 lab time = 13.5
real time = 1.9 lab time = 14.2
real time = 2.0 lab time = 15.1
real time = 2.0 lab time = 16.9
real time = 2.0 lab time = 17.8
real time = 2.0 lab time = 18.7
real time = 2.0 lab time = 19.5
real time = 2.1 lab time = 20.4
real time = 2.1 lab time = 21.2
real time = 2.1 lab time = 22.1
real time = 2.1 lab time = 23.9
real time = 2.1 lab time = 24.8
real time = 2.1 lab time = 25.7
real time = 2.2 lab time = 26.5
real time = 2.2 lab time = 27.4
real time = 2.2 lab time = 28.2
real time = 2.2 lab time = 29.1
real time = 2.2 lab time = 30.9
real time = 2.3 lab time = 31.8
real time = 2.3 lab time = 32.7
real time = 2.3 lab time = 33.5
real time = 2.3 lab time = 34.4
real time = 2.3 lab time = 35.3
real time = 2.3 lab time = 36.2
real time = 2.3 lab time = 37.1
real time = 2.4 lab time = 38.9
real time = 2.4 lab time = 39.8
real time = 2.4 lab time = 40.6
real time = 2.4 lab time = 41.5
real time = 2.4 lab time = 42.4
real time = 2.5 lab time = 43.3
real time = 2.5 lab time = 44.1
real time = 2.5 lab time = 46.4
real time = 2.5 lab time = 47.7
real time = 2.5 lab time = 48.6
real time = 2.6 lab time = 49.5
real time = 2.6 lab time = 50.3
real time = 2.6 lab time = 51.2
real time = 2.6 lab time = 52.1
real time = 2.6 lab time = 53.9
real time = 2.7 lab time = 54.8
real time = 2.7 lab time = 55.7
real time = 2.7 lab time = 56.5
real time = 2.7 lab time = 57.4
real time = 2.7 lab time = 58.3
real time = 2.7 lab time = 59.2
real time = 2.8 lab time = 60.1
real time = 2.8 lab time = 61.0
real time = 2.8 lab time = 62.8
real time = 2.8 lab time = 63.6
real time = 2.8 lab time = 64.5
real time = 2.8 lab time = 65.4
real time = 2.9 lab time = 66.3
real time = 2.9 lab time = 67.1
real time = 2.9 lab time = 68.9
real time = 2.9 lab time = 69.8
real time = 2.9 lab time = 70.7
real time = 3.0 lab time = 71.6
real time = 3.0 lab time = 72.4
real time = 3.0 lab time = 73.3
real time = 3.0 lab time = 74.2
real time = 3.0 lab time = 75.1
real time = 3.0 lab time = 76.8
real time = 3.1 lab time = 77.7
real time = 3.1 lab time = 78.6
real time = 3.1 lab time = 79.5
real time = 3.1 lab time = 80.4
real time = 3.1 lab time = 81.3
real time = 3.1 lab time = 82.2
real time = 3.2 lab time = 83.1
real time = 3.2 lab time = 84.8
real time = 3.2 lab time = 85.7
real time = 3.2 lab time = 86.6
real time = 3.2 lab time = 87.5
real time = 3.2 lab time = 88.4
real time = 3.3 lab time = 89.2
real time = 3.3 lab time = 90.1
real time = 3.3 lab time = 91.9
real time = 3.3 lab time = 92.7
real time = 3.3 lab time = 93.6
real time = 3.4 lab time = 94.5
real time = 3.4 lab time = 95.4
real time = 3.4 lab time = 96.3
real time = 3.4 lab time = 97.2
real time = 3.4 lab time = 98.1
real time = 3.5 lab time = 99.9
Hi, all The below code self explains.
I believe labtime.setrate(n) should make the simuation faster than real time for n times. But the actual result is not expected.