Closed robinheghan closed 8 years ago
@jcollard any thoughts on this? I think it's just a matter of adding a git tag for the library to be added to melpa stable.
It's hard to have a "stable" package against an unstable language. That is, many backwards-incompatible changes in Elm itself will likely lead to backwards-incompatible changes to elm-mode
. If we were to follow semantic versioning we could pick an arbitrary starting point like 0.x.y
to represent the fact that the API may change at any time until Elm itself has a stable release but I feel like that would sort of defeat the point of the whole thing. Would a scheme like that still be useful to you as a MELPA stable user?
Yes. It allows me to use Melpa for all my packages. Besides, Elm doesn’t update all that often, and elm-mode is pretty stable in my experience.
Alright, I've tagged the current HEAD
as v0.5.0
(as an arbitrary starting point). Let me know if you encounter any issues.
Thanks!
Would be nice to have this on melpa stable