@fignuts nevermind, I started looking into this 😄 I can't prove that this is doing tree shaking yet, but I'm using the babel configs you recommended in the webpack configs and it's at least running on my machine.
Coverage increased (+1.9%) to 94.403% when pulling d21935175d0340a7d9e742a49f1f2986340a98e2 on webpack2-tree-shaking into 206f237229f4d4656cac394ec8923ddb6ae5dad0 on webpack2.
Coverage increased (+1.9%) to 94.403% when pulling d21935175d0340a7d9e742a49f1f2986340a98e2 on webpack2-tree-shaking into 206f237229f4d4656cac394ec8923ddb6ae5dad0 on webpack2.
@fignuts nevermind, I started looking into this 😄 I can't prove that this is doing tree shaking yet, but I'm using the babel configs you recommended in the webpack configs and it's at least running on my machine.