Open jcowey opened 2 years ago
Each note
should probably have a xml:id, if we want to be able to refer to any specific note
/ sentence
<figure>
<head>Table 2: nominations to liturgy, approvals of liturgy, and liturgical oaths (2nd – 3rd c. CE)</head>
<list>
<item xml:id n="n1">The format (pagina or demotic style) was assessed according to the general shape of the sheet, not by an exact calculation of the width/height ratio.</note>
<item xml:id n="n2">Fragmentary documents were omitted, unless enough was preserved to determine if they were prepared in the pagina or demotic style format.</note>
<item xml:id n="n3">In the columns “pagina format” and “demotic style format”, some documents are labelled as abstracts and copies. Strictly speaking, they are irrelevant for the present purpose, but they were kept in the table in order to provide a more balanced impression of the available data.</note>
<item xml:id n="n4">In the columns “nomination” and “approval”, bold characters indicate documents with a top space left free for the approval (or filled with the approval).</note>
</list>
<table>
<row>
<cell style="text-align: justify;">reference</cell>
...
</row>
</table>
</figure>
This should not be a figure at all. Can we put list
with its item
s between head
and table
?
In the Schubert article the following sections has to be rendered in XML:
Before the rows and cells of the actual table start, there are some explanatory comments made about the cells, which effectively form part of a list. My first stab at this is to use
noteGrp
withnote
for each comment in the list.See: https://github.com/jcowey/P3/blob/master/pylon/pylon1schubert/schubert_liturgy_geography.xml#L273-L312.
Suggestions, improvements?