Add feature to assign custom "quality gate" manage permission to specific user or group

[noor409]

Hi ,

Am able to assign custom quality gates manage permission to specific user/ group via UI,

[EvertonSA]

let me clarify on this one because this description is not very clean,

I as a Sonarqube administrator would like to create a custom quality gate per team I'm managing and assign key users of that team to manage the quality gate.

On the UI, we can assign a Quality Gate to a person, and that person is capable of administer the quality gate rules by then selfs. On this terraform provider, it seems not possible.

Can we have this implemented?

[jdamata]

Is this possible with the sonarqube api?

You can assign users the 'gateadmin' role via sonarqube_permissions but i believe this is a global permission not project scoped.

IE: https://github.com/jdamata/terraform-provider-sonarqube/blob/668f89406ac98f3fba565c92e14335f897dd83bf/docs/resources/sonarqube_permissions.md#example-set-codeviewer--user-permissions-on-project-level-for-a-user-called-johndoe

[EvertonSA]

@jdamata it seems to be:

but it does not show on the docs on http://localhost:8000/web_api/api/qualitygates

from my understanding, it's a POST on /api/qualitygates/add_user with --data-raw 'gateName=&login='

[EvertonSA]

I also tested for groups and the API is the same:

it's a POST on /api/qualitygates/add_user with --data-raw 'gateName=&login='

[EvertonSA]

perhaps we should have a sonarqube_qualitygate_usergroup_association resource?

[jdamata]

Thanks for the investigation @EvertonSA. I was able to find this in the web_api docs. This api is marked as an 'internal' api.

Use at your own risk; internal services are subject to change or removal without notice.

[EvertonSA]

@jdamata I would like to work on this, do you consider a sonarqube_qualitygate_usergroup_association a good approach or would you do something different?

[jdamata]

Yah that resource sounds good. I'm a little concerned that this API might change significantly. Please be sure to add acceptance tests with the new resource

[EvertonSA]

this issue can be closed