Closed freeranger closed 1 year ago
After reading https://github.com/jdamata/terraform-provider-sonarqube/issues/154#issuecomment-1525546478 I think we are either going in 2 directions.
Populating conditions into state that are not defined in TF isn't something im crazy about
Agreed that this is probably redundant if we go with #154 - I submitted this because it looks like the intent was to populate the conditions
but that it was failing because the body had already been read...though that didn't matter since pre-9.9
there was nothing to populate anyway.
So fixing an apparent bug but likely surplus to requirements in the near future
can this be closed since https://github.com/jdamata/terraform-provider-sonarqube/pull/163 will be merged
Closing in favour of #163
Fixes https://github.com/jdamata/terraform-provider-sonarqube/issues/156
If you apply the fix but don't update the test then:
9.8
and below there will be no change and the tests will pass9.9
and above, the relevant test will failUpdating the test will allow it to pass successfully with either version