Apple Privacy Manifest

[manahilov]

Hi team, Is there a plan to include the PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy manifest as required by Apple? ref: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/privacy_manifest_files

Thanks, Boyan

[LionWY]

+1

[zeroskylian]

https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements/

[brendand]

+1

[zziazm]

+1

[379800792]

+1

[CH3COOH]

Hello! Does anyone know which API used in MBProgressHUD is problematic?

[threema-matteo]

Hey @jdg , are there any updates on this?

[liam-i]

I made a Swift version of the HUD. https://github.com/liam-i/FlyHUD

Thanks a lot to Jonathan George for building MBProgressHUD - all my ideas and many implementation details were provided by his library.

This HUD does not use any data or API from the privacy manifest. And it's not on this list either.

If you are interested, please browse and provide valuable feedback.

[adrianosouzapd]

+1

[brendand]

@liam-i Will your Swift implementation also work from Objective-C?

[liam-i]

@liam-i Will your Swift implementation also work from Objective-C?

Cannot run directly on Objective-C. But bridging is possible, please refer to the HUD-Bridging-OC and OCPresentViewController.m files.

[nmendiratta89]

+1

[frankiebarrios]

+1

[theLittleApps]

+1

[percival888]

+1

[shsw228]

+1

[RideShi]

+1

[MrMage]

Instead of replying with +1, could everyone please just press the "thumbs up" emoji on the original post and subscribe to notifications in the sidebar? If you post a "+1", everyone who is already subscribed to this thread gets an unneccessary notification.

[manahilov]

I made a Swift version of the HUD. https://github.com/liam-i/FlyHUD

Thanks a lot to Jonathan George for building MBProgressHUD - all my ideas and many implementation details were provided by his library.

This HUD does not use any data or API from the privacy manifest. And it's not on this list either.

If you are interested, please browse and provide valuable feedback.

Actually it is on the list - https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements, why I don't know. Just went trough the source and indeed it is not using any of the described APIs..

[percival888]

According to Apple's requirements, even if the APIs that needs to be explained are not used, it's need to include a manifest to declare that they're not using any of the affected APIs or tracking anything. However, they must include such a file regardless.

[manahilov]

Thank you for the PR @CH3COOH, anyone with write permissions that can merge it? cc: @jdg

[jdg]

merged, thanks!

[matrejek]

@jdg would there be a chance to add new version tag on this change? It's obviously possible to target specific revision but targeting tag/version seems way cleaner :)

[manahilov]

Can someone open a PR with updated Swift package?

// swift-tools-version:5.9
import PackageDescription

let package = Package(
    name: "MBProgressHUD",
    products: [
        .library(name: "MBProgressHUD", targets: ["MBProgressHUD"])
    ],
    targets: [
        .target(
            name: "MBProgressHUD",
            dependencies: [],
            path: ".",
            exclude: ["Demo"],
            sources: ["MBProgressHUD.h", "MBProgressHUD.m"],
            resources: [.copy("PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy")],
            publicHeadersPath: "include"
        )
    ]
)

That should include the Privacy manifest when consuming the framework via SPM. I don't have permissions to create a PR.

Thank you in advance.

[matrejek]

I have opened #653 with the change as suggested by @manahilov - @jdg - could you have a look?