Closed nservant closed 4 years ago
Sorry I missed this. Right now, the detect command is considered experimental. It detects frequent sequences, but they might not necessarily be adapters. In this case, it looks like you only detected one adapter sequence: the second one is the reverse-complement of the first (and the first one has 3 extra bp). The third one is a sub-sequence of the first. So if you just trim the first adapter you should catch them all.
Once I release v2.0 (which should be before the end of the year), I will work on an improved adapter-detection algorithm that should make the results less confusing.
Hi, I'm a bit confused by the atropos detect results, and I would need some advice in a context of automatic reads trimming.
Here is an exemple of output ;
The point which is confusing to me is that it detected 3 adapters, which are completly different ? What would be your advice ? Do you think I should trim the 3 adapters ? or just choose one and in this case, how ?
Thank you for your help Nicolas