Closed jdrouet closed 5 months ago
Great stuff! I was reviewing the package a few weeks ago and determined it wouldn’t be possible for us to use it just because of the license, as we’d be building a Python package that could reasonably be interpreted as an "email product".
Great stuff! I was reviewing the package a few weeks ago and determined it wouldn’t be possible for us to use it just because of the license, as we’d be building a Python package that could reasonably be interpreted as an "email product".
Check out https://github.com/mgd020/mjml-python
Actually mjml-python is a good implementation but doesn't implement all the mechanisms for mj-includes
. If you need that feature, I also build and maintain a python library of mrml.
https://pypi.org/project/mrml/
Actually mjml-python is a good implementation but doesn't implement all the mechanisms for
mj-includes
Could you let me know which mechanisms of mj-includes
are missing?
The MJML side of things is handled by MRML library, and the Python side is responsible for providing a callback function to retrieve the contents given the include name.
It doesn't include http/file out of the box, but that would be simple for the user to implement (e.g. using requests) depending on the users security/isolation level.
Oh, my bad, I didn't see your latest update 😊
After discussing with multiple individuals, it has come to my attention that the previous license used for this project may not have been a valid open-source license. I am considering switching to MIT, but I am open to further discussion on this topic. I will keep this pull request open for a few days to allow for input and discussion. If nobody convinces me to select another license, I will proceed with merging this update.