Closed kwinz closed 1 year ago
Hi,
Yeah I should add an explanation in the README.md, good point.
The short story is that I think that zmq is a couple of good idea hidden inside a unmaintainable mess with sharp edges at every corner. So even if you try very hard to wrap it neatly in a easy to use library (which is what I tried to do), you can't solve the core problem. I moved away from using zmq & TCP because I think they create more problems than they solve, at least for me. I wrote my own networking library on top of QUIC based on the lessons I learning writing libzmq-rs
.
Is there a suggested libzmq-rs replacement?
If you are looking for a zmq-based replacement, I can't really recommend anything else. I still think libzmq-rs
is the most competent zmq bindings library out there (or it was at the time I wrote the library) because its the only one that is not a complete footgun. However I wouldn't recommend using libzmq-rs
at all, because at the end of the day, I wouldn't recommend using zmq.
Any clue as why it was archived and a way forward?
I wasn't satisfied with the end product and I didn't want to dedicate any more time to it. I archived it to indicate I didn't want to support it anymore.
I added this comment to libzmq-rs
:
:warning: I wouldn't recommand using ZeroMQ or any ZeroMq bindings library (including
libzmq-rs
), unless you absolutely have to. If you do, thenlibzmq-rs
might fit your use case since it basically makes ZeroMQ not a complete footgun. However, just because this library hides the unmaintainable mess that is ZeroMQ, doesn't mean the mess does not exist. See this comment for more context.
Hi, sorry to bother you on your other repo, I don't know any other way to contact you. I saw that
libzmq-rs
is archived, but not explanation in README.md, or anywhere else. Is there a suggestedlibzmq-rs
replacement? Is the project being forked? Any clue as why it was archived and a way forward?