Closed thet0ast3r closed 2 years ago
Hi, most probably that would work. The camera supports some lower resolution - not sure if as low as 96x96 - but that could be achieved by cropping the incoming data from the camera. As for sending the data as jpeg or uncompressed - not sure why it's important to you. The jpeg is way more efficient and you can crank up the quality quite a lot. It's not just the fact that it's less data to send, it's also that there's less data to receive from the sensor - which is a limiting factor for the max FPS achievable.
Another thing - I just remember - the camera component was indeed hacked quite a lot to improve the latency by sending the data as it arrives from the sensor. But I only changed the jpeg code, not the uncompressed one. You'd have to change that as well if you want to play with the uncompressed stream.
Hi, currently, this only works when using jpeg compressed streaming. Would support for high fps (30-90)fps be possible with grayscale output and a low res like 96x96?