Open ddelemeny opened 1 year ago
Thanks, I think you are right about the out of bounds, however, your code would give negative indices when c is greater than next as -4%8 is -4 for example.
I guess it should be: int a = (next-c)>=0? (next-c) : (NSLOT+next-c);
Fixing it should make improve the accuracy of the correlation as the out of bounds location will have a random value.
Oh, that's a nice language specific quirk I didn't know about: the modulo operator may or may not return a signed value depending on the language.
In JS and C the operator is implemented using the truncated definition, therefore -4%8
returns -4.
In python (which I'm more familiar with and tend to use for quick and dirty checks) it uses the floored definition and returns 4.
TIL.
Hi!
https://github.com/jeffmer/WatchApps/blob/d8dff30062ebdb14a727d5340129a68471f069eb/apps/heart/heartv2.app.js#L34
I think this line should be written
int a = (next-c) % NSLOT;
as the current form will be out of bounds whennext == c