Open paolabarajas opened 4 years ago
I will check on this but, off the top of my head, there are two McCune papers the second being a modification to the original formula.
Best, Jeff
Jeffrey S. Evans, Ph.D., | Senior Landscape Ecologist & Biometrician The Nature Conservancy | Protected Lands Science Visiting Professor | University of Wyoming | Zoology & Physology Laramie, WY | jeffrey_evans@tnc.orgmailto:jeffrey_evans@tnc.org | (970) 672-6766<tel:(970)%20672-6766>
From: Paola Barajas Barbosa notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 12:46 PM To: jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics GradientMetrics@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics] Heat Load Index - is this value in the formula wrong? (#7)
Dear Jeffrey Evans,
I have a question about a value in the HLI formula you wrote in the PDF, where you describe the Geomorphometry & Gradient Metrics toolbox for ArcGIS (https://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics/blob/master/READ%20ME.pdfhttps://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics/blob/master/READ%20ME.pdf).
In your PDF the formula for HLI appears like this: HLI = 0.039 + [0.808 β cos(π) β cos (π)] β [0.196 β sin(π)] β [0.482 β cos(π(πΌ)) β sin(π(πΌ))]
Then you cite McCune & Keon, 2002, as they are the authors of the formula. But, I see that in Table 2 of McCune & Keon, 2002 the value is different, i.e., 0.339.
I would assume this may be a typo in your PDF document, right?
This I just spot last week thanks to a very friendly and detailed review I got from a paper I submitted. I am using some of your metrics in my research.
Looking forward to your response about this little issue. Best, Paola
β You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics/issues/7, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLKH74WRCGTRNTHPODOGNTROCEFLANCNFSM4MPKUUTQ.
Thank you very much for your prompt answer. Just in case, the McCune & Keon paper where I found the equation is https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02087.x
Also, thanks a lot for the effort you put in making all this nice the tools available for us.
Paola Barajas martha.barajas-barbosa@uni-goettingen.de paolabarajas@gmail.com
It is the McCune (2007) βImproved estimates of incident radiation and heat load using non-parametric regression against topographic variableshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02590.xβ paper that provides the corrections used in the toolbox. Please, also be aware that I am no longer developing this toolbox as ESRI is just making it to difficult to maintain code around their software. I have provided all of these functions, excluding CTI, in the R package spatialEco, available on CRAN and GitHub.
Best, Jeff
From: Paola Barajas Barbosa notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:53 PM To: jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics GradientMetrics@noreply.github.com Cc: Jeffrey Evans jeffrey_evans@TNC.ORG; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics] Heat Load Index - is this value in the formula wrong? (#7)
Thank you very much for your prompt answer. Just in case, the McCune & Keon paper where I found the equation is https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02087.xhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02087.x
Also thanks a lot for the effort you put in making all this nice the tools available for us :)
β You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics/issues/7#issuecomment-618627856, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACLKH7YB32JLFHNOLX6Z3XTROCMA3ANCNFSM4MPKUUTQ.
Dear Jeffrey Evans,
I have a question about a value in the HLI formula you wrote in the PDF, where you describe the Geomorphometry & Gradient Metrics toolbox for ArcGIS (https://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics/blob/master/READ%20ME.pdf).
In your PDF the formula for HLI appears like this: HLI = 0.039 + [0.808 β cos(π) β cos (π)] β [0.196 β sin(π)] β [0.482 β cos(π(πΌ)) β sin(π(πΌ))]
Then you cite McCune & Keon, 2002, as they are the authors of the formula. But, I see that in Table 2 of McCune & Keon, 2002 the value is different, i.e., 0.339.
I would assume this may be a typo in your PDF document, right?
This I just spot last week thanks to a very friendly and detailed review I got from a paper I submitted. I am using some of your metrics in my research.
Best, Paola