ohAitch
commented
5 years ago Yup, the outdented blank comments should certainly be outdented all the way to the running rune, and the zuse newline is good.
As for pseudo-joined style, it looks like some of clay is doing something similar? But yeah just outdenting them seems fine.
On Friday, 1 March 2019, Jeffrey Kegler notifications@github.com wrote:
wutbarpam.lint.txt https://github.com/jeffreykegler/yahc/files/2921614/wutbarpam.lint.txt I implemented both split and joined 0-running hoons, and will introduce a stub that will allow for a minimum length of split and a maximum length of joined 0-running hoons. I'll follow up with that back in issue #13 https://github.com/jeffreykegler/yahc/issues/13 .
Here I think this are all candidates for anomaly.suppressions, with the possible exception of jael, where you might say a pseudo-joined style is being used. But it would be the only case for WUTBAR/WUTPAM in the whole arvo/ corpus, suggesting it's a error and not a pattern.
@ohAitch https://github.com/ohAitch -- let me know what you think.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jeffreykegler/yahc/issues/19, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABxXhj889bTtR6H5me7evZeZAQvUTrEHks5vSdTrgaJpZM4baFnk .
jeffreykegler
wutbarpam.lint.txt I implemented both split and joined 0-running hoons, and will introduce a stub that will allow for a minimum length of split and a maximum length of joined 0-running hoons. I'll follow up with that back in issue #13 .
Here I think this are all candidates for
anomaly.suppressions, with the possible exception of jael, where you might say a pseudo-joined style is being used. But it would be the only case for WUTBAR/WUTPAM in the wholearvo/corpus, suggesting it's a error and not a pattern.@ohAitch -- let me know what you think.