Notice that we can then eliminate the -w option on flatten, using liftheads to postprocess instead. Anyway, then write a listdeps script that takes the output of liftheads (either flattened or not!) and lists the dependencies:
S|likes NP|John <--- instead of mentioning parent S|likes, maybe mention sister VP|likes? Or both? But in the flattened case, the sister doesn't have a nonterminal type.
VP|likes NP|Mary
VP|likes RB|tremendously
the idea being that we list each type with the types of its non-head kids. Come to think of it, this would work even without having done liftheads, it's just that these nonlexicalized dependencies wouldn't be as interesting! Options could indicate on the dependents something about their position. A better format might be
likes S John NP
but we could get that by postprocessing. Anyway, the idea of getting this output is to be able to cluster words by the fillers of their dependent roles, or the dependent roles they fill for other particular words.
[item from the old TO-DO file dated 2002-04-07]
Write a
liftheadsscript that turnsinto
Notice that we can then eliminate the
-woption onflatten, using liftheads to postprocess instead. Anyway, then write alistdepsscript that takes the output ofliftheads(either flattened or not!) and lists the dependencies:the idea being that we list each type with the types of its non-head kids. Come to think of it, this would work even without having done liftheads, it's just that these nonlexicalized dependencies wouldn't be as interesting! Options could indicate on the dependents something about their position. A better format might be
but we could get that by postprocessing. Anyway, the idea of getting this output is to be able to cluster words by the fillers of their dependent roles, or the dependent roles they fill for other particular words.