Contrast these two lines in train0-15.simple.len5. They suggest that we are missing arg-marking on the RHS if the LHS is arg-marked! No: it is just that the first line was originally NP-CLR and PP-CLR, so marking was correctly suppressed according to Collins 1997. So this is just fine. (There are in fact plenty of lines where both LHS and RHS have arg marks.)
03/wsj_0349.mrg:765: take S~ TO @ NP PP
13/wsj_1377.mrg:512: take S TO @ NP~ PP
[item from the old TO-DO file dated 2002-04-07]
Contrast these two lines in
train0-15.simple.len5. They suggest that we are missing arg-marking on the RHS if the LHS is arg-marked! No: it is just that the first line was originallyNP-CLRandPP-CLR, so marking was correctly suppressed according to Collins 1997. So this is just fine. (There are in fact plenty of lines where both LHS and RHS have arg marks.)