Closed michaelnordmeyer closed 2 years ago
See "Handling Atom Text and Content Constructs" (http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/12/07/handling-atom-text-and-content-constructs.html) for an explanation why this is valid and the recommended way of handling unescaped content in XML documents.
TL;DR: Much nicer to read if you for some reason have a look at the feed.xml source. Also less parsing on the client-side.
I found just one failed test and fixed it.
@jekyllbot: merge +fix
See "Handling Atom Text and Content Constructs" (http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/12/07/handling-atom-text-and-content-constructs.html) for an explanation why this is valid and the recommended way of handling unescaped content in XML documents.
TL;DR: Much nicer to read if you for some reason have a look at the feed.xml source. Also less parsing on the client-side.