The same comment line is found multiple times in the codebase so changing it just here would be confusing.
I did not really intend to reference proper java types here just give an indication of the type of data it contains , even with your changes Int is not a proper java type it would have to be Integer in case of the boxed primitive
The same comment line is found multiple times in the codebase so changing it just here would be confusing.
I did not really intend to reference proper java types here just give an indication of the type of data it contains , even with your changes
Int
is not a proper java type it would have to beInteger
in case of the boxed primitiveI think i'll just leave it as is.