Closed dosisod closed 4 years ago
Hi @dosisod, thanks for creating this issue.
Although I think your usecase is pretty reasonable, but I think that this feature doesn't fit in the [current] scope of Vulture.
Also, we wouldn't do anything about a commented out piece of code which resides in a file which has other code as well. That behavior could be a little confusing for users.
It could be commented out code, comments without code, or simply a file with nothing in it. Maybe there could be an option that would enable this behavior, and have it disabled by default.
As long as it does not have any false positives, I don't see any major issues with this addition, though I may be wrong.
I think the idea is interesting, but it's probably such a rare case that files only contain comments that it's not worth the trouble of maintaining the code for reporting them. Also, even a file with only an unnamed string might serve a legitimate purpose, since we can access the string with __doc__
.
Consider the
.py
file below:It clearly was commented out, and then forgotten about. It probably isn't mean to be there anymore.
Obviously, there are cases where you would want empty python files, for example,
__init__.py
. In general though, it would be better to tell the user about it.Open to ideas!