We tend to store unittests in the same script that we're testing, so the current auto ignoring of tests that live in a test/tests directory is not suitable for us.
It would seem, rather than guessing that tests are always in a test/tests directory (or indeed that non-tests wouldn't be stored in such a directory), that it would be useful to check the base class?
We tend to store unittests in the same script that we're testing, so the current auto ignoring of tests that live in a test/tests directory is not suitable for us.
It would seem, rather than guessing that tests are always in a test/tests directory (or indeed that non-tests wouldn't be stored in such a directory), that it would be useful to check the base class?