search

jenkinsci / jenkinsfile-runner

A command line tool to run Jenkinsfile as a function
MIT License
1.14k stars 296 forks source link

Update the JDK and Jenkins Core to the latest versions #641

Closed pandaasu closed 1 year ago

pandaasu commented 2 years ago

Jenkins and plugins versions report

Environment ```text Paste the output here ```

What Operating System are you using (both controller, and any agents involved in the problem)?

Using Azure VM with following specifications

Reproduction steps

Even a basic pipeline isn't getting kicked off because few of the plugins are demanding latest version of JDK or latest version of Jenkins Core. Along with this, the script for linux provides many features more than the windows one and our runner is a Windows, so please add the latest features and versions support for windows too.

Here I am leaving a copy of my codebase here for reference - jfr_setup

Expected Results

The expecetd result was the same as the screenshot provided in the README file of Jenkinsfilerunner. We have modified many things by far within a week but we are getting many errors one after another because of the version issues. Here I am sharing a short piece of log WARNING o.j.p.workflow.graph.FlowNode#persistSafe: failed to save actions for FlowNode id=2 java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field private static final long java.lang.Throwable.serialVersionUID accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @[54](https://github.com/<Org-name>/bai_test_jfr_compatibility/runs/7739653449?check_suite_focus=true#step:3:55)f5f647 at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.checkCanSetAccessible(Field.java:180) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible(Field.java:174) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.FieldDictionary.buildDictionaryEntryForClass(FieldDictionary.java:176) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.FieldDictionary.buildMap(FieldDictionary.java:142) at

Actual Results

Everytime we solve one issue regarding version another one pops up, so unable to share any particular issue. For the time being sharing the issues showed up the last time.

WARNING o.j.p.workflow.graph.FlowNode#persistSafe: failed to save actions for FlowNode id=2 java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make field private static final long java.lang.Throwable.serialVersionUID accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @[54](https://github.com/<Org-name>/bai_test_jfr_compatibility/runs/7739653449?check_suite_focus=true#step:3:55)f5f647 at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:354) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:297) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.checkCanSetAccessible(Field.java:180) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Field.setAccessible(Field.java:174) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.FieldDictionary.buildDictionaryEntryForClass(FieldDictionary.java:176) at com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.FieldDictionary.buildMap(FieldDictionary.java:142) at

Anything else?

Requesting help from the maintainers as well as @lucaspanjer @cris @cowboyd @vbehar @trondn @oleg-nenashev

Thanks

oleg-nenashev commented 2 years ago

It should land after https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkinsfile-runner/pull/640

lhupfeldt commented 2 years ago

640 is merged, is anything else blocking a new release?

This is preventing us from testing with the same versions that we use in our Jenkins deployments.

oleg-nenashev commented 2 years ago

Nothing was blocking except me being underwater with the personal and work stuff. I will try to release it ASAP

lhupfeldt commented 2 years ago

A colleague of mine just reported a plugin compatibility issue. I told him to wait for this. Is there anything we can do to assist?

oleg-nenashev commented 2 years ago

@lhupfeldt good question. I think we should be okay, will try to release in the coming days. The project needs more contributors and co-maintainers

lhupfeldt commented 2 years ago

@oleg-nenashev Any ETA on the release?

lhupfeldt commented 1 year ago

@oleg-nenashev Any issues with the release? Can we help?

thiagosanches commented 1 year ago

looking forward for this!

mcambal commented 1 year ago

same here, it becomes a blocking issue. I am sure, we all don't want pushing you @oleg-nenashev and understand you have other activities, but It would be good to clearly know whether this repository is abandoned or not. It is important to know, if we should take actions to find a different solution or this repo is a perspective long-term solution. If yes, the regular upgrade and maintenance plan is the basic requirement.

What are your thoughts on this?

oleg-nenashev commented 1 year ago

@mcambal The repository is not abandoned but I've been on a long sabbatical as it was announced in the developer mailing list and other channels (war in Ukraine, parenting and other personal reasons). I'm always interested in having co-maintainers, and everyone is welcome to participate in this project

Going back to the issue, it should be somewhat addressed in https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkinsfile-runner/releases/tag/1.0-beta-31 . There are likely many issues with the release, and everyone is welcome to test it out and to share their feedback. Please reopen this issue if it does not work for your use-case