jenkinsci / peass-ci-plugin

Jenkins plugin for peass to support performance measurement in CI
https://plugins.jenkins.io/peass-ci/
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
4 stars 13 forks source link

Moved CleanBuilderTest to package peass/ci/clean since this is wher C… #188

Closed mawHBT closed 2 years ago

mawHBT commented 2 years ago

CleanBuilderTest was in de.peass.ci.clean.callables, CleanBuilder in de.dagere.peass.ci.clean so I moved CleanBuilderTest to peass.ci.clean. Packages still differ bei dagere

DaGeRe commented 2 years ago

Could you than move to the exact package, i.e. including dagere? Or is there a reason to not do so?

mawHBT commented 2 years ago

All packages in test are missing "dagere", except de.dagere.peass.ci.peassOverview.

DaGeRe commented 2 years ago

Ok, so if you're starting to change the package, change it to the correct package directly. Since I do not own the domain peass.de, we cannot deploy anything under de.peass and it does not really make sense to have anything in this package. If you want to, you can also change all packages.

mawHBT commented 2 years ago

I did not create any package (also no peass.de), I just moved CleanBuilderTest one level up. All packages in main are named de.dagere.peass.ci..., all in test are named de.peass.ci... CleanBuilderTest was in de.peass.ci.clean.callable, so I just moved it up to de.peass.ci.clean since CleanBuilder is in clean also, not in callable.

DaGeRe commented 2 years ago

Yes, but by convention, one should only use package names associated with the domain one owns (in this case: peass.dagere.de). It does not make sense to move packages one time to de.peass.XX, and afterwards de.dagere.peass.XX, since these two changes would just create noise in the git history. To shorten the process, I just reorganized the packages myself, including the move of CleanBuilderTest: https://github.com/jenkinsci/peass-ci-plugin/commit/de2949572f5911ba18843c092eac2f019e821a9d Does this work for you? Otherwise, feel free to create another PR.

mawHBT commented 2 years ago

Packages were reorganized with de29495, including movement of CleanBuilderTest. So this PR is omitted.