Closed jennykim1016 closed 7 years ago
Nice catch, Jenny. Looks like those 0.05 mag corrections are small enough to ignore to first order, would you say?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Jenny Kim notifications@github.com wrote:
For this http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/97/meta#apj485108t5 paper, the magnitudes are in CFHT, but they could easily be converted to SDSS magnitudes by considering offsets of zeropoints. This http://terapix.iap.fr/article.php?id_article=713 seems to contain some useful information.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jennykim1016/OM10/issues/4#issuecomment-275610750, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AArY9xi0-B6geLquKWNsG0EUTJoHP1VDks5rWabMgaJpZM4LvVod .
Yes, I will ignore the discrepancies. Thanks!
1) In addition to this, for QuasarColorComparison, I should fix OM10 to make it read the .csv or .txt data as well. Currently, it just allows me to read .fits data. If that is too much, I can just set the constructor equal to the input data in the body of the notebook.
2) The style for Alessandro et al.
notebook needs some improvements. I should write comments and improve the readability.
Edit : Everything resolved. Closing the issue.
I should change all the uppercase magnitudes to the lowercase magnitudes. Line 6 does not change that -- I should change plotting.py.