`procedure_call_003` doesn't activate for a procedure call inside a process

[JHertz5]

Environment

$ vsg --version
VHDL Style Guide (VSG) version: 3.19.0+zip.file
Git commit SHA: Unknown.  Installed via zip file.

Describe the bug procedure_call_003 does not work on procedure calls within processes.

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Create a file called test.vhd with the following contents

   
   architecture rtl of test is

begin

proc_call(formal_1 => actual_1, formal_2 => actual_2, formal_3 => actual_3);

proc_label : process is begin

proc_call(formal_1 => actual_1,
          formal_2 => actual_2,
          formal_3 => actual_3);

end process proc_label;

end architecture rtl;

2. Create a file called test.yml with the following contents:
```vhdl
rule:
  procedure_call_003:
    first_open_paren: 'remove_new_line'
    last_close_paren: 'add_new_line'
    association_element: 'add_new_line'
    association_list_comma: 'remove_new_line'

4. Run vsg -f ./test.vhd -c ./test.yml and observe the following output:

   $ vsg -f ./test.vhd -c ./test.yml 
   ================================================================================
   File:  ./test.vhd
   ================================================================================
   Phase 1 of 7... Reporting
   Total Rules Checked: 158
   Total Violations:    2
   Error   :     2
   Warning :     0
   ----------------------------+------------+------------+--------------------------------------
   Rule                      |  severity  |  line(s)   | Solution
   ----------------------------+------------+------------+--------------------------------------
   procedure_call_003        | Error      |          5 | Move parenthesis to next line.
   procedure_call_003        | Error      |          7 | Move parenthesis to next line.
   ----------------------------+------------+------------+--------------------------------------
   NOTE: Refer to online documentation at https://vhdl-style-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html for more information.

   Note that the procedure_call within the process has not been picked up by the rule.

Expected behavior I would expect both procedure calls to be treated by the rule.

[JHertz5]

I just noticed that the description specifies "concurrent procedure calls". I am changing this issue to a question - is there a rule that enforces structure for sequential procedure calls?

[JHertz5]

I can't seem to change the tag from bug to question. I am closing this issue and will raise a separate question issue.