Current code leaves a loophole in the varBitmap[k] case, where k is the row/column...it allows any value other than the row/column number to be there without enforcing the negative constraint. Really, this code could probably use some re-factoring...it is trying to cover too many cases too slickly.
Current code leaves a loophole in the varBitmap[k] case, where k is the row/column...it allows any value other than the row/column number to be there without enforcing the negative constraint. Really, this code could probably use some re-factoring...it is trying to cover too many cases too slickly.