Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Added missing Test.EmBER file.
Original comment by nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 8:19
Attachments:
Similar behaviour experienced with EmberPlusViewer 1.1.2. When clicking in the
tree view on a parameter, value change requests are sent to the provider.
Original comment by nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 8:26
It is even worse - it seems that value change requests with the previous
clicked parameter value are sent.
Original comment by nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 8:35
Sorry, I cannot reproduce this issue. When following steps 1 to 5 I always see
the correct minimum value.
The reason for the parameter update is the following:
- default slider value is the parameter's minimum
- when the minimum is changed, the slider values gets changed which triggers a
notification.
- this does not happen when you change the parameter value using the slider
before changing the parameter's minimum.
Best regards,
Philip
Original comment by p...@l-s-b.de
on 29 Apr 2013 at 9:28
Ok, about point 1. of the expectations: I recognize, that the minium value is
applied after leaving the focus of the minimum value text field (in
TinyEmberPlus). That explains, why the minimum value is not transfered to
consumer when just using the up and down arrows (controled by the mouse).
I think, the slider problem explains point 2.
So, it would be better if the slider is set to the position of the actual value
retrieved from the provider.
Original comment by nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 11:24
Another story is this:
1. Start TinyEmberPlus.exe and open the attached Test2.EmBER
2. Start EmberPlusViewer.exe and open a connection to TinyEmberPlus
3. Browse to the parameters by clicking the small arrows in the
EmberViewerPlus, the values are:
-> 001, MyParameter, 8
-> 002, MyStringParam, text
4. Adjust the minimum of 'MyParameter' to 4
5. Select 'MyParameter'
6. Select 'MyStringParam' in the EmberViewerPlus and the value changes from
text to 0
Original comment by nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 11:36
Attachments:
I got #7 reproduced, thanks for the report! Next version will bring improvement
here...
Original comment by p...@l-s-b.de
on 30 Apr 2013 at 1:49
Original comment by Kimon.Ho...@lawo.com
on 2 May 2013 at 3:31
Original comment by Kimon.Ho...@lawo.com
on 2 May 2013 at 3:35
Fixed in version 1.2.0
Original comment by p...@l-s-b.de
on 2 May 2013 at 3:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nullable...@gmail.com
on 29 Apr 2013 at 8:16