It'd certainly cut down on the code overhead. However, it'd require back-processing code and possibly some enhancements on the JNoSQL side to allow for this sort of field metadata. In the mean time, it'd probably work to just make _readers an array field, since that should get sent back to a special named field on Domino.
It'd certainly cut down on the code overhead. However, it'd require back-processing code and possibly some enhancements on the JNoSQL side to allow for this sort of field metadata. In the mean time, it'd probably work to just make
_readersan array field, since that should get sent back to a special named field on Domino.