Or it's a malformed documentation and it's right to use options after split subcommand? I am asking as providing options before subcommand when they are not global is the bad idea: subcommand is like some sort of namespace which allows us access just some options and not all at once not to have a big mess.
Or it's a malformed documentation and it's right to use options after
splitsubcommand? I am asking as providing options before subcommand when they are not global is the bad idea: subcommand is like some sort of namespace which allows us access just some options and not all at once not to have a big mess.