codacy-production[bot]
commented
1 week ago Coverage summary from Codacy
See diff coverage on Codacy
| Coverage variation | Diff coverage |
|---|---|
| Report missing for a62a5089d6ed5ba989279590a5bd3426829c856d[^1] | :white_check_mark: 85.71% |
Coverage variation details
| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (a62a5089d6ed5ba989279590a5bd3426829c856d) | Report Missing | Report Missing | Report Missing | | | Head commit (26132cf5bdae7ec81e9a0708c722ad2a9cf0c2cf) | 52755 | 45699 | 86.62% | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: `Diff coverage details
| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#3686) | 42 | 36 | **85.71%** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences
:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.
Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more [^1]: Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.
Fix a performance regression that I introduced with v0.41: when entering or leaving staging mode for a file, or when switching from a file that has only unstaged changes to one that has both staged and unstaged changes, there was a noticeable lag of about 500ms on my machine. With the improvements in this PR we get this back down to about 20ms.
Sits on top of #3685.