Open jesus2099 opened 4 years ago
It’s superb that #244 × 2 = #488.
Removed the special merge technique from OP:
git checkout master git checkout #244_y-van-z_all-shook-up-links mb_INLINE-STUFF.user.js
(it seems that using
--patch
would be if I wanted to pick changes instead of taking all file)
I tested this technique for updating .gitignore
and it does not show as a branch merge.
I want to show the Yvanzo branch merging into master, explicitely, in history.
Hi @yvanzo,
Could you tell me if I understood right in my latest fbc901543b44384c58fcf753175eff2777a3789a?
Every time I update this #244 branch, GitHub suggests to create a pull request (PR, merge request). Do you think it would be better, maybe?
Hi @jesus2099,
Adding parentNode
seems to be correct but I’m not so sure about the added sidebar
in this commit. IIRC the idea was to insert them next to other search links, maybe even in the searchLinks
list? I don’t see them appearing anyway. Wasn’t there a dialog to allow setting them too?
About the pull request workflow, it’s only useful when you want feedback from someone else before merging.
Thanks again to keep caring about user scripts!
Yes, there is little bit of inconsistencies between the (I guess) similar addHiddenLinks()
, addSearchLinksSection(sectionPath, parentNode)
and addUserLinks(parentNode)
.
I will check that in the future.
User links are empty per default, there used to be an ugly prompt
to edit them.
They would be good before the standard search links, because they are user specifics, user needs.
I am still working on this @yvanzo big set of features #244.
This will be done when I will merge above branch into
master
, discarding all changes to other files thanmb_ALL-LINKS.user.js
.See branch commits, diff Compare branch with master, diff
Switch scripts in browser (Ctrl+click or middle-click):
Remember to (I made sure my previous checklist was included):
%language%
syntax e6b47381ff28313ed8cf8a2763e58d51ad3bad59%artist-latin-script-name%
in Yvanzo's help