Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
i can't reproduce this. if you can supply a jsfiddle demonstrating the
problem we can reopen. otherwise i'm marking it invalid for now.
(are you sure the connector is not going outside of the bounds of the element
to which it is attached?)
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 6 Feb 2013 at 10:19
Could you explain more about what you mean by the bounds of the element to
which it is attached? If this the container for the flowchart or the shape that
it connects on to? How are the bounds defined?
Original comment by mikeedwa...@googlemail.com
on 7 Feb 2013 at 9:30
i mean the parent element of the svg elements. is it fully contained within the
parent element?
it's odd that you don't see the behaviour in ie9. can you reproduce this in a
fiddle?
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 7 Feb 2013 at 9:44
I have setup the problem: http://jsfiddle.net/S7Qvv/5/
Original comment by mikeedwa...@googlemail.com
on 7 Feb 2013 at 10:28
great, thanks. reopening. seems to be caused by the stub value of [5,5]. if
you change it to [25,25] it renders fine.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 7 Feb 2013 at 10:40
Issue 309 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 12:01
i have merged issue 309 into this one as it is related: what is needed is a
uniform way for jsplumb to determine what size the containing svg element needs
to be. this code is a little adhoc at the moment and spread out amongst the
various connector types. it needs to be formalised.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 12:02
Issue 319 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2013 at 5:40
Issue 319 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2013 at 5:48
Issue 321 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2013 at 9:33
Issue 321 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 20 Feb 2013 at 8:03
this is done now. the painting has been optimised.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2013 at 9:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mikeedwa...@googlemail.com
on 30 Jan 2013 at 12:58Attachments: