Open lachlan-roberts opened 11 months ago
At the very least, can we not call it a Fuzzer, since it does not introduce random data, it is not a Fuzzer... it is just a TestUtil.
I have no problem with retaining it, but it should be implemented in a reasonable way and not use EndPoint directly... unless to deliberately inject EOFs for testing.
The WebSocket
Fuzzer
makes the testing more complex, and introduces some other potential issues by writing through the endpoint without going through WebSocket flushers and changing theWebSocketSessionState
.Investigate whether this is necessary and try to reduce/remove its usage if not.