But the styling isn't great: the footnote numbers affect the line-height, they are underlined, and the styling isn't quite right. So this PR simply replicates the styling of sidenote numbers for footnote numbers.
In my own article I need to use both sidenotes and footnotes, so to differenciate them I replaced sidenote numbers with a * by adding this CSS:
/* Optional : change sidenote numbers to a symbol */
.sidenote-number:after {
content: '*';
font-size: 1rem;
top: -0.3rem;
left: 0.1rem;
}
.sidenote:before {
content: "*";
font-size: 1rem;
top: -0.3rem;
}
It gives me * sidenotes and numbered footnotes, like so:
However I think it should remain optional so I didn't put it in the PR.
I saw that in
pandoc-sidenoteyou added a syntax for normal footnotes: https://github.com/jez/pandoc-sidenote/commit/73181b4e01e0707e6a4b3f4f37e11b1adc01e6a9But the styling isn't great: the footnote numbers affect the line-height, they are underlined, and the styling isn't quite right. So this PR simply replicates the styling of sidenote numbers for footnote numbers.
In my own article I need to use both sidenotes and footnotes, so to differenciate them I replaced sidenote numbers with a * by adding this CSS:
It gives me * sidenotes and numbered footnotes, like so:
However I think it should remain optional so I didn't put it in the PR.