Closed MatthiasPetermann closed 2 years ago
From the error, it seemed it related to Redmine receive emails module. All fields have been mentioned in https://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineReceivingEmails Hope this does some help.
Hello,
unfortunately I did not receive any notification of your reply and would like to apologize for the late reaction. Today I updated my Redmine and took the opportunity to check for new versions of my used plugins. I noticed your answer. Unfortunately I did not quite understand what to do. I call the mail handler as follows:
#!/bin/sh
export GEM_HOME=/usr/local/redmine/.gem
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
cd /usr/local/redmine/current/
bundle26 exec rake -f /usr/local/redmine/current/Rakefile redmine:email:receive_imap RAILS_ENV="production" host=192.168.2.14 username=username password=password folder=INBOX move_on_success=INBOX/processed move_on_failure=INBOX/failed project=helpdesk tracker=Aufgabe allow_override=project,tracker,priority unknown_user=accept no_permission_check=1
As a test I have set allow_override to "all". This did not bring any change either. The good news is that my patch from back then still works. Maybe someone can have a look at it again?
Many thanks in advance Matthias
Think I fixed that issue today with commit e3a1794e087dda200afd5194da142706db293226. Can you confirm?
Hello Stefan,
Since I discovered the redmine_helpdesk plugin, I have been able to (almost) completely release myself from email for general IT support and am much more organized. Thanks a lot for this!
At the turn of the year I switched my Redmine to version 4.1 (on Ruby 2.6) and also updated the redmine_helpdesk plugin to the latest version from master.
With this combination, sending the "first response" initially no longer worked. In the Redmine log there was the following note:
I was able to use this patch to bring the affected code to an older version that was still working:
However, this is probably a step backwards since you have certainly introduced the custom_field_value method for a good reason. If you have the opportunity to take a look at it, I'm happy to test it.
Best wishes Matthias