Closed asvoboda closed 2 years ago
Ok, well, let me knock the ball back into your court.
Our documentation isn't the best, and after looking at it I am pondering if it can meet the terraform lifecycle; meaning I'd have to research it's feasibility.
But, before I go that far, how about you propose some hcl that
For the purpose of a TF example, I would suggest encoding most of the existing API parameters (I know there are a lot.. so I'll ignore some of them).
resource "xray_vulnerability_report" "vuln" {
name = "test-vuln-report-1"
resources {
repository {
name = "repo1"
}
repository {
name = "repo2"
include_path = "org/name/**"
}
build {
name = "build1"
include_path = "foo/bar/**"
}
}
filters {
vulnerable_component = "*vulnerable:component*"
impacted_artifact = "some://impacted*artifact"
has_remediation = false
cve = "CVE-1234-1234"
}
}
I believe reports are immutable (at least, according to the api docs), so modifying any attribute would trigger a destroy and recreate. Perhaps this is the root of your question?
I don't really mind what the exact terraform looks like and I would defer some of the questions like "should the report type exist as a different resource, or a param to a generic reports resource?" to you and the maintainers.
@asvoboda, @jamestoyer, it's released in v1.9.0, thanks for the ticket!
Currently, the xray tf provider does not support configuring reports. The API [1] supports creating various types of reports with many options. Ideally, support should exist in this provider for the following set of distinct report types
[1] https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/JFROG/Xray+REST+API#XrayRESTAPI-REPORTS